Insights

Return to insights

Minimizing Drawdown Lay the Foundation to Quick Recovery

18 September 2020

By Sarvajeet Bodas
  • Behavioral Finance
  • Drawdowns
  • India Equity
  • Investment Insights
a man using a bar chart as stairs

Minimizing Drawdown Lay the Foundation to Quick Recovery

Almost everyone has heard the expression, at one time or another, that “the best defence is a good offence.”

Be it football, cricket or investing, offensive play is more evident. It seems the human brain is wired to accentuate offensive gains.

In football, everyone remembers how a striker scored a goal, but not the steal and tackle by a defender or midfielder that created the goal.

The similar is true in the world of cricket. In the T-20 format, scoring 24 runs in an over is more glamorous than bowling a tight over by a bowler by just giving three runs.

The investing world is no different. Here, the bull market is glamorous. Investors focus more on the gains, chasing fancy stocks, hot sectors, and fads. Less attention is given to the portfolio’s ability to protect the downside risk.

Sir Alex Ferguson, the famous football coach of Manchester United once immortally stated, “Attack wins you games but defence wins you titles.”

What he meant was, attacking players will score the goals that win games, but defenders are the ones fighting till hell and back to prevent your goals from being equalised. A good defence sees one through difficult matches.

In investing, the investors often forget the underrated but crucial role of the ability to protect the downside risk from market drawdowns in determining long-term outcomes.

After all, what matters is the ability to restrict drawdowns during unavoidable downturns that come in the investing journey, and reasonably able to capture the upside over long periods.

Let’s understand this aspect through a case study and examples.

First, the math of a drawdown and the recovery.

Consider a 20% drawdown. To get back to the original level, you need a 25% gain.

Or take a 50% loss. Now, to come back to the original level, you need a 100% gain.

The steeper the drawdown, more daunting it is to get back to the starting point.

Let’s say your portfolio value is Rs 5 million. Due to some unavoidable event like Covid-19 or any other black swan event, your portfolio experiences a 30% drawdown and the portfolio value is now Rs 3.5 million.

I know, I know… the markets have recovered very quickly. But the point is if the recovery after a sharp drawdown gets delayed, then what happens?

Now, it gets interesting here.

If a portfolio earns 15% annualised returns, it will take 2.55 years to return to the starting point. As your returns get lower, the number of years required to recover your original portfolio value gets further delayed.

For young investors who have just started investing, this is not much of a concern. But consider middle-aged or older investors. They have to carefully consider drawdown risk to avoid large losses as they near retirement.

Now let’s understand this aspect through a case study.

In the Multi-Act framework, we have classified companies considering multiple Quantitative parameters (like ROCE, ROE, Free Cash Flow, Leverage etc) and Qualitative parameters (Corporate governance, Competitive advantage etc).

Based on the above, we have categorised companies into different grades and further categorised these companies into High Quality (HQ) and Low Quality (LQ) buckets.

Let’s look at what happened during the financial crisis of 2007-08.

Although the LQ index was outperforming the HQ index in the beginning, during the severe downturn, LQ index collapsed by 55%, whereas, HQ index was down by about 24%.

Similarly, in terms of recovery, the HQ index was quick to rebound to its earlier starting point and that took about 220 days. Whereas, the LQ index took a whopping 315 days to recover.

Let’s look at this year.

The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic is an unprecedented shock to the Indian economy.

How did the HQ and LQ index perform?

The above chart shows the impact on the HQ and LQ index. The HQ index saw a drawdown 27%, it took 157 days to come back to the earlier starting point. The LQ index, on the other hand, witnessed a steep drawdown of 46% and has yet to recover.

Remember, the steeper the drawdown, more daunting it is to get back…

How did Multi-Act’s portfolio schemes perform during this time-frame?

Click here to know more about the performance, drawdown and recovery.

Many investors mistakenly base the success of their portfolios on returns alone. However, it is equally important to consider the risk involved in achieving those returns.

In the bear market, investors often sell and wait on the sidelines, and miss an equity market rebound. Minimizing drawdowns discourage such behavioural mistakes.

By restricting drawdowns and reasonably capturing the upside, over the long period, a portfolio is in a better position to compound returns when things bounce back.

Download Article PDF

Recent Articles

Is this sector going to underperform?

As the world stepped into the year 2020, we were hit by ‘Covid – 19’. While news … Continued

Read more
City landscape

Indian IPO Party Gets a Reality Check

 “IPOs are doing so great…”  “Why don’t you guys ever suggest investing in IPOs”  “Hot IPOs of … Continued

Read more

Do Indian Stocks outperform G-Secs?

The Background: In May 2018 Prof. Hendrik Bessembinder published a study in the Financial Journal of economics … Continued

Read more

Stay up to date with Multi-Act

Receive monthly updates by signing up to our newsletter.

Current complaints

Data for the month ending- October, 2022

Complaints status
Sr. No. Received from Pending at the end of last month Received Resolved* Total Pending # Pending complaints > 3 months Average Resolution time^ (in days)
1 Directly from Investors 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 SEBI (SCORES) 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Other Sources
(if any)
0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
^ Average Resolution time is the sum total of time taken to resolve each complaint in days, in the current month divided by total number of complaints resolved in the current month.

Trend of Monthly Disposal of Complaints

Sr. No. Month Carried forward from previous month Received Resolved* Pending#
1 April 2022 0 0 0 0
2 May 2022 0 0 0 0
3 June 2022 0 0 0 0
4 July 2022 0 0 0 0
5 August 2022 0 0 0 0
6 September 2022 0 0 0 0
6 October 2022 0 0 0 0
Grand Total
0
0
0
0
*Inclusive of complaints of previous months resolved in the current month. #Inclusive of complaints pending as on the last day of the month.

Trend of Annual Disposal of Complaints

Sr. No. Year Carried forward from previous year Received Resolved* Pending#
1 2019-20 0 0 0 0
2 2020-21 0 0 0 0
3 2021-22 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0
*Inclusive of complaints of previous months resolved in the current month. #Inclusive of complaints pending as on the last day of the year.