Options for Yield Enhancement
Portfolios are often seen as long journeys, built patiently for compounding. Yet along the way, there are … Continued
Read more28 June 2019
In God we trust. For everybody else, we stand by our QoE analysis.
Here’s a follow-up on our previous article on CX & K. Recently we observed that a company operating in the tours and travels business has plummeted, with stock prices eroding by nearly 80% in the last one year. If you have been following our blog, we gave a meticulous explanation of this very company’s long haul in our article – Lost and Found: The Many Acquisitions of a Travel Company, and identified red flags in advance (August 2018). In this follow-up article we would like to address some of our previous points and present some new points we have unearthed subsequently, that should have been early warning signs for investors.
Truth to the transaction: The management’s commentary while acquiring the business vs. at time of their sale reflect poor decision-making. Prior to sale of education business in 2018, the company had effectively sold off 50% of the acquired BH business and written off 47% of the acquisition price. Further, upon sale of education business in 2018, it thus now has effectively disposed most of the originally acquired BH business in 2011.It sold the education business (part of BH business acquired in 2011) in 2018 for a consideration of INR 43 bn. and booked a gain of INR 13 bn. Proceeds from all the disposal of acquired businesses have been used by the company to repay debt.
An article by ‘The Ken’ suggests that promoters have been pledging shares to raise funds for company’s associate T-Hotels (promoter group entity). We then looked at pledged shares of promoters in T-Hotels:
We further analysed the financial statements of T-Hotels for last 3 years and found the following. The company reported no operations and has been reporting losses (INR -79 mn. for FY 2019) and had negative net worth of INR -176 mn. The company is laden with ~650 mn. worth of debt as at March 2019 (details of debt not available). The debt reported on March 2018 balance sheet was ~ INR 585 mn. (all unsecured but not from CX & K) and as at March 2017 balance sheet, total debt stood at INR 544 mn. (all unsecured), 60% of which was from CX & K.Interestingly, in the standalone books of CX & K, the investment value reported for T-Hotels (as associate) had not been impaired till FY 2018 and has been carried at cost, despite continuous losses and negative net worth. However in the consolidated financial statements, CX & K has carried T-Hotels at nil.March 2019 consolidated earnings release does report ‘impairment in associates’ as part of extra-ordinary items but no further details are available.
As the CX & K’s investment in B2B has increased, receivables have piled up over time. In Q3 FY 2019, the company had said that it will be reducing the focus on the B2B segment and will focus on the B2C segment. Its competitor, Thomas Cook had receivables which accounted for ~12-25% of revenue. This was a large discrepancy we observed in the receivables t/o (possibly due to different business models also).
Portfolios are often seen as long journeys, built patiently for compounding. Yet along the way, there are … Continued
Read more
India’s economy isn’t moving in lockstep—it’s unfolding in layers. Factory floors are buzzing, but credit growth is … Continued
Read more
A sharp rally followed by a gradual decline—this defines the Rounding Top Formation . Our analysts, Lloyd … Continued
Read moreReceive monthly updates by signing up to our newsletter.
|
Sr. No. |
Received from |
Pending at the end of last month |
Received |
Resolved* |
Total Pending # |
Pending complaints > 3 months |
Average Resolution time^ (in days) |
|
1 |
Directly from Investors |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
SEBI (SCORES) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
Other Sources (if any) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Grand Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number of complaints received during month against the IA due to impersonation by some other entity:
Note: In case of any complaints received against the IA due to impersonation of the IA by some other entity, the IA may adjust the number of such complaints from total number of received/resolved complaints while preparing the above table. Further, IA must close such impersonation related complaints after following the due process as specified by SEBI/ IAASB.
* Inclusive of complaints of previous months resolved in the current month.
# Inclusive of complaints pending as on the last day of the month
^ Average Resolution time is the sum total of time taken to resolve each complaint in days, in the current month divided by total number of complaints resolved in the current month.
|
Sr. No. |
Month |
Carried forward from previous month |
Received |
Resolved* |
Pending# |
|
1 |
April, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
May, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
June, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4 |
July, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
5 |
August, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
6 |
September, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
7 |
October, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Grand Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
*Inclusive of complaints of previous months resolved in the current month. #Inclusive of complaints pending as on the last day of the month.
|
SN |
Year |
Carried forward from previous year |
Received |
Resolved* |
Pending# |
|
1 |
2021-22 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
2022-23 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
2023-24 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4 |
2024-25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Grand Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
*Inclusive of complaints of previous years resolved in the current year. #Inclusive of complaints pending as on the last day of the year.