Options for Yield Enhancement
Portfolios are often seen as long journeys, built patiently for compounding. Yet along the way, there are … Continued
Read more15 October 2025
When Premiums Signal Pressure, Strategy Must Lead
Silver Exchange Traded Fund (ETFs) trading at a 10% premium are not just a pricing anomaly; they are a sign. Supply constraints and investor demand are inflating price discovery, reminding us that timing and discipline matter more than ever.
ETF prices can differ from NAV due to market demand and supply mismatches, especially in commodities like silver. Investors should track both NAV and the traded price to understand its true value and potential returns.
Explore whatâs driving Silver ETF premiums and what it means for you.
Portfolios are often seen as long journeys, built patiently for compounding. Yet along the way, there are … Continued
Read more
Indiaâs economy isnât moving in lockstepâitâs unfolding in layers. Factory floors are buzzing, but credit growth is … Continued
Read more
A sharp rally followed by a gradual declineâthis defines the Rounding Top Formation . Our analysts, Lloyd … Continued
Read moreReceive monthly updates by signing up to our newsletter.
|
Sr. No. |
Received from |
Pending at the end of last month |
Received |
Resolved* |
Total Pending # |
Pending complaints > 3 months |
Average Resolution time^ (in days) |
|
1 |
Directly from Investors |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
SEBI (SCORES) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
Other Sources (if any) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
 |
Grand Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number of complaints received during month against the IA due to impersonation by some other entity:
Note: In case of any complaints received against the IA due to impersonation of the IA by some other entity, the IA may adjust the number of such complaints from total number of received/resolved complaints while preparing the above table. Further, IA must close such impersonation related complaints after following the due process as specified by SEBI/ IAASB.
* Inclusive of complaints of previous months resolved in the current month.
# Inclusive of complaints pending as on the last day of the month
^ Average Resolution time is the sum total of time taken to resolve each complaint in days, in the current month divided by total number of complaints resolved in the current month.
|
Sr. No. |
Month |
Carried forward from previous month |
Received |
Resolved* |
Pending# |
|
1 |
April, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
May, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
June, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4 |
July, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
5 |
August, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
6 |
September, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
7 |
October, 2025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
 |
Grand Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
*Inclusive of complaints of previous months resolved in the current month. #Inclusive of complaints pending as on the last day of the month.
|
SN |
Year |
Carried forward from previous year |
Received |
Resolved* |
Pending# |
|
1 |
2021-22 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
2022-23 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
2023-24 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4 |
2024-25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
 |
Grand Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
*Inclusive of complaints of previous years resolved in the current year. #Inclusive of complaints pending as on the last day of the year.